Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Demond Depree Bluntson v. Texas
IFP petition · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, No. AP-77,067 · judgment May 7, 2025
Question presented
This case presents important issues concerning the Sixth Amendment right to represent oneself in a criminal proceeding and the fair administration of justice in Texas. Petitioner respectfully presents these issues, which warrant the involvement of this Court, for review: I. Whether the 6th and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution prevent a State appellate court from imputing a finding to a trial judge that a defendant suffered severe mental illness sufficient to deny him the right to represent himself when that trial court first found no more than that the defendant had "issues" and later explicitly denied that its ruling was based on the defendant's mental illness? 2. Whether a trial court's undefined and legally unsupported "extremely high" requirement of legal proficiency from a defendant wishing to represent himself can be allowed to stand, when that standard comports with neither Faretta v. California,422 U.S. 806 (1975),nor Indianav. Edwards, 554 U.S.l64 (2008), and would preclude virtually all lay people from representing themselves?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Hilary Sheard
Law Office of Hilary Sheard
For respondent
—
Proceedings
- Mar 23 2026Petition DENIED.
- Feb 26 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2026.
- Dec 29 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 4, 2026)
- Oct 17 2025Application (25A438) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until December 27, 2025.
- Oct 10 2025Application (25A438) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 28, 2025 to December 27, 2025, submitted to Justice Alito.