Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Djonibek Rahmankulov v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 23-6321 · judgment September 29, 2025
Questions presented
-
A writ of certiorari is requested to determine whether the district court’s loss calculation which included intended losses under §2B1.1 Application Note 3 of the Sentencing Guidelines and the losses attributed to alleged co-conspirators was erroneous in light of this Court’s decision in Kisor v. Wilkie, 588 U.S. 558 (2019).
-
A writ of certiorari is requested to determine whether the district court’s final bank fraud instruction to the jury constructively amended Count Three of the indictment, charging bank fraud [18 U.S.C. §1344], by including the elements of both subsections 1 and 2 of the statute when the indictment, which did not articulate the subsection being charged, only included language that tracked subsection 2. PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING The parties to the proceeding are those named in the caption. The Petitioner is Djonibek Rahmankulov. The Respondent is the United States of America.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jillian Spitzer Harrington
Jillian S. Harrington, Attorney at Law
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 06 2026Petition DENIED.
- Mar 18 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/2/2026.
- Mar 18 2026Reply of petitioner Djonibek Rahmankulov filed. (Distributed)
- Mar 02 2026Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
- Jan 28 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 2, 2026.
- Jan 27 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 30, 2026 to March 2, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
- Dec 24 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 30, 2026)