Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Elvert S. Briscoe, Jr. v. Ohio
IFP petition · Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County, No. 114667 · judgment January 9, 2025
Questions presented
-
Has a pro se party received due process of notice and redress under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution if the final appealable judgment entry is sent to a non-party attorney and resulted in the loss of an appeal as of right?
-
Did the State violate Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S. Ct. 1194, 10 L. Ed.2d 215 (1963) and Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 92 S. Ct. 763, 31 L. Ed.2d 104 (1972), if the State’s SANE expert withholds impeachment evidence of prior law suits of incompetent examinations and diagnoses?
-
Did trial counsel deny the effective assistance of counsel by failing to discover impeachment evidence of the State’s SANE expert’s history of incompetent examinations and diagnoses?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Elvert S. Briscoe Jr.
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 23 2026Petition DENIED.
- Jan 29 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
- Nov 24 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 14, 2026)