Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Craig Jonathan Warner v. Texas
Paid petition · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, No. WR-96,439-01, WR-96,439-02 · judgment August 20, 2025
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
At least ten states’ courts and four federal circuit courts recognize that a state’s unknowing presentation of false testimony denies a defendant due process. At least three states’ courts and five federal circuit courts hold the opposite: only the knowing presentation of false testimony violates the Fourteenth Amendment. Which side of the split is correct?
-
At Petitioner’s trial on charges of sexually abusing two girls, the State of Texas called two witnesses who falsely testified that a swab of one girl’s vagina tested positive for a protein unique to semen. Was the false testimony material, as the trial court concluded but the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals rejected?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Brett Evan Ordiway
Ordiway PLLC
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 23 2026Petition DENIED.
- Jan 14 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
- Nov 12 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 31, 2025)