Aldo DiBelardino v. Jason S. Miyares, Attorney General of Virginia, et al.

Does the systematic manipulation of our grand jury authority—contrary to its constitutionally intended role as a "protector of citizens [the People] against arbitrary and oppressive governmental actions," as affirmed in United States v. Williams (1992)—violate the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments’ due process guarantees, as evidenced by: o the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals’ October 24, 2024 rulings in Nos. 24-1269 and 24-1843, o the ongoing law enforcement abuses exemplified by the Rolin Hill homicide cover-up, and o the sustained lawfare campaign against President Trump and affiliated People?

Has the federal judiciary’s suppression of the People’s Fifth Amendment right to directly access and petition our grand jury—originating with the 1946 Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure—effectively amended the Constitution without lawful process, violating due process and barring the People from initiating “ex mero motu” grand jury proceedings with plenary subpoena power to secure justice?

As affirmed in Printz v. United States (1997), does the sheriff, as the highest constitutional law enforcement officer in each county or equivalent, have the authority and duty to safeguard the People’s right to grand jury oversight as an essential mechanism for restoring due process, securing constitutional rights, and ensuring government accountability?