Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Elias Xavier Rosario Torres v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 24-11929 · judgment August 19, 2025
Question presented
A person who is convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime, but whose firearm qualifies under federal law as a machinegun, faces a mandatory 30-year consecutive sentence, rather than the statute’s otherwise applicable 5-year, 7-year, and 10-year consecutive penalties. Compare 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(B)(ii), with id. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i)-(iii). In the D.C. and Eleventh Circuits, the automatic nature of the weapon is a strict liability element, while in the First Circuit, the government must prove the defendant knew it was a machinegun. The question presented is whether the presumption of mens rea applies to 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(B)(ii) requiring the government to prove that a defendant knew of the automatic capability of a firearm before subjecting the defendant to a consecutive, decades-long mandatory minimum sentence.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jenny L Devine
Office of the Federal Defender
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jan 12 2026Petition DENIED.
- Dec 11 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
- Dec 03 2025Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Nov 17 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 19, 2025)