Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Mally Gage v. Mayo Clinic, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 23-4410 · judgment June 23, 2025
Certiorari denied · December 8, 2025
Questions presented
-
Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, can employers demand statements of apostasy as well as set restrictions on how an employee can communicate their religious beliefs or accommodation needs as a condition of employment?
-
Under the Due Process Clause and this Court’s precedents, what magic words are needed to overcome a motion to dismiss for a pro se litigant?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Mally Gage
For respondent
Amelia Anne McDermott
Littler Mendelson, P.C.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Dec 08 2025Petition DENIED.
- Nov 13 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/5/2025.
- Nov 06 2025Waiver of right of respondent Mayo Clinic, et al. to respond filed.
- Oct 14 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 26, 2025)