Frederick M. Hill v. Angela Stuff, Warden

Should the “one fair shot” and procedural due process require the court of appeals to notify a petitioner that an appeal and briefing schedule is being converted back to a COA, if an amended CO A could bring forth arguments for granting the COA?

If the trial record clearly shows on its face egregious violations of the Fourth and Sixth Amendments; and cause for procedural default, is there a debatable and substantial constitutional claim; or is it adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed for a COA to be granted? a. During a “knock and talk” criminal investigation when there is no answer at the first door of “public common use” does it allow police to play “Let’s Make a Deal” by knocking on doors numbers two and three? b. Whether a “knock and talk,” is a physical intrusion; and a Fourth Amendment violation when access is gained by a pathway that the public would not normally use? c. During a criminal investigative “knock and talk”, on a single, private, unregulated commercial building, is it entitled to the same Fourth Amendment protection as a house and its “curtilage”?