Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Daniel Matthew Matlock v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 24-7054 · judgment May 23, 2025
Question presented
This Court has consistently and repeatedly held that the term “knowingly” in a criminal statute must apply to all of the elements of the crime that make the defendant’s conduct criminal, i.e., the elements that evince a “vicious will” as distinguished from otherwise innocent conduct. The question presented is: Whether the term “knowingly” in 18 U.S.C. § 2242(1) (sexual abuse) applies only to “causing another person to engage in a sexual act” or whether it extends also to “threatening or placing that other person in fear.”
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Gregory Mitchell Acton Sr.
Acton Law Office, PC
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Nov 10 2025Petition DENIED.
- Oct 16 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
- Oct 10 2025Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Sep 29 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 3, 2025)