Jason Adam Jensen v. United States, et al.

Jason Adam Jensen, appearing pro se, respectfully petitions for a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, a judgment that stands as a stark testament to the systemic denial of justice for the mentally ill and disabled. I. QUESTIONS PRESENTED

1. Does the in forma pauperis dismissal process under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (ii), which applies the Rule 12(b)(6) "failure to state a claim" standard sua sponte and prior to service of process, deprive pro se litigants, particularly those with mental illness and disabilities, of the procedural safeguards and full application of rules typically afforded under Rule 12(b)(6), thereby creating an insurmountable barrier to justice and effectively removing any means of getting remedy for the already legally neglected mentally ill, constituting a profound due process violation?

2. Does the application of state involuntary commitment statutes, particularly when predicated on vague "erratic behavior" and prejudicial neighbor reports