Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

In Re Ahmad Aljindi

IFP petition


Dismissed · November 24, 2025

Questions presented

  1. Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, led by Chief Judge Kimberly A. Moore, violate its mandatory duty under FRAP 27 and the United States Constitution by refusing for over 135+ days to adjudicate Petitioner’s May 6, 2025, Combined Motion to Recall Mandate, Strike, and Vacate All Court Orders, thereby obstructing justice and perpetuating hate crimes under color of law, as evidenced by Moore’s conceded “Fucking Muslim” insult and coordination with fired DOJ attorneys to evade service in Supreme Court Case 23-5543? 2- Did Judge David A. Tapp of the United States Court of Federal Claims commit fraud, obstruction ofjustice, and hate crimes under color of law by issuing a retaliatory Anti-Filing Injunction on August 21, 2025 (ECF 34, Case No. 1:24-cv-00242-DAT), despite his status as a named defendant in a sealed Bivens action (8:25-cv-01785-FMO(JDEx)), tampering with dockets, coordinating with Chief Judge Gee in C.D. Cal. Case No. 8:20-cv-00796-PSG-DFM on July 31, 2025, to deny on same day two Motions to Reopen under Rule 60(b) for Fraud on Courts, and ignoring irrefutable evidence of intellectual property takings?

  2. Does the systemic judicial coup across 22 federal dockets since 2018, including government concessions via waivers in Supreme Court Cases 19-7708,21- 6181, 22-5670, and 23-5543, demand unified mandamus relief to vacate all tainted orders, disqualify biased judges, and refer wrongdoers for impeachment and prosecution under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 371, 2382, and 1001, to restore judicial integrity as mandated by the American People’s November 5, 2024, vote for law and order?

  3. Should this Court, as guardian of the Constitution (Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137(1803)), declare all prior orders void ab initio to halt the erosion of public trust (Pew Research 2024: 75% distrust) and prevent further waste of taxpayer funds (S5.6M+ per U.S. ex rel. Adams, 813 F.3d 1259), ensuring no corrupt judicial officer undermines the Republic’s rule of law? LIST OF PARTIES [] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. [ X ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all parties to the proceeding in the court whose judgment is the subject of this petition is as follows:

  4. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

  5. United States Court of Federal Claims. RELATED CASES • Supreme Court Case No. 19-7708: Ahmad Jamaleddin Aljindi v. United States, et al. Petition denied April 6, 2020; rehearing denied June 1, 2020. The government waived

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Ahmad Jamaleddin Aljindi

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Nov 24 2025
    The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
  2. Nov 06 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/21/2025.
  3. Oct 25 2025
    Motion to expedite consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus filed by petitioner.
  4. Oct 06 2025
    Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
  5. Sep 22 2025
    Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 27, 2025)