Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

In Re David C. White

IFP petition


Certiorari denied · November 24, 2025

Question presented

3 4 1. Shall U.S. Courts at all levels persist in exercising extreme bias 5 against pro se or any litigants, contrary to Judicial Code of conduct 6 and Loper Bright Enterprises, especially in use of Administrative 7 Law to nullify Federal Law for Summary Judgment, by dismissing 8 a case when defense fails to Appear, thus perpetrating Conspiracy 9 in Obstruction of Justice. 10 11 2. Shall any court under cover of judicial immunity, dismiss a case of 12 ADA violation as “frivolous” without thorough investigation - 13 potentially pending by ADA investigative Authority - thus 14 perpetrating a Conspiracy in Obstruction of Justice against our 15 most vulnerable citizens? 16 17 3. Shall any Judge who dismisses a case when Defense fails to 18 Appear be guilty of Misprision of Felony, having reviewed the 19 felonies admitted by abandonment of the defense, and then does 20 nothing to adjudicate them, thus denying due process of law in 21 defiance of Loper Bright? 22 23 4. Shall any Court illegally dismiss a Complaint as frivolous when 24 Defendants are in default, but the Judge fails to enforce the 21+1 25 day FRCP rule, which limits the time for response before a default 26 summary judgement may be entered. 27 28 5. Shall a ruling of “frivolous” be rendered only after a thorough 29 investigation of case facts and law, rather than subjective Judicial 30 Discretion under Administrative Law? 31 32 6. If a case is found to be frivolous after thorough investigation shall 33 the accuser be subject to the same penalty that he attempted to 34 inflict on the accused? 35 36 7. Shall Judicial Immunity be reserved exclusively for Courts 37 convened Under Article III of the U.S. Constitution and denied to

Counsel of record

For petitioner
David C. White

For respondent

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Jan 12 2026
    Rehearing DENIED.
  2. Dec 23 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
  3. Nov 28 2025
    Petition for Rehearing filed.
  4. Nov 24 2025
    Petition DENIED.
  5. Nov 06 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/21/2025.
  6. Sep 15 2025
    Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 24, 2025)