In Re David C. White

2 Q(x) 3 4 1. Shall U.S. Courts at all levels persist in extreme bias against pro se or 5 any litigant, contrary to Judicial Code of Conduct and Loper Bright, 6 especially in use of Administrative Law to nullify federal law for 7 Summary Judgment, by dismissing a case when defense fails to 8 Appear? This unjust procedure is systemic throughout the Ninth 9 Circuit Court System, suggesting collusion in obstruction of justice. 10 11 2. Shall a judge who dismisses a case when defense fails to Appear be 12 guilty of Misprision of Felony, having reviewed the felonies admitted by 13 abandonment of the defense, then does nothing to adjudicate them, 14 thus denying due process of law in defiance of Loper Bright? 15 16 3. Shall a ruling of “frivolous” be rendered only after a thorough 17 investigation of case facts and law, rather than subjective Judicial 18 Discretion under Administrative Law? 19 f 4 20 4. Shall judges in the Ninth Circuit persist in violation of Loper Bright, thus 21 denying citizens 14th Amendment equal protection under the law, 22 compared to citizens in other jurisdictions such as the Tenth Circuit, 23 which complies with Loper Bright, per their home page? 24 25 5. Shall judicial immunity be reserved exclusively for Courts convened 26 under Article III of the U.S. Constitution and denied to illegal 27 Administrative Law courts convened in defiance of Loper Bright and 28 Article III of the U.S. Constitution? 29 30 a. Shall any Judge or Justice have absolute judicial immunity for 31 violation of federal laws or the U.S. Constitution, thus denying 32 citizen rights to due process of law? 33 34 6. Shall any court under cover of judicial immunity, dismiss a case of 35 ADA violation as “frivolous” without thorough investigation -- 36 potentially pending by ADA investigative Authority -- thus denying due 37 process and equal protection of law to our most vulnerable citizens? 38