Clarence B. Jenkins, Jr. v. Office of the South Carolina Governor, et al.

I. Is a Charge filed with U.S. Employment Opportunity Commission required to bring a lawsuit in federal court against an employer(s). II. Is it lawful to deny a citizen of these United States of America the right to work, earn an income and privileges guaranteed by U.S. Constitution. HI. Is it lawful for The US. District Court to dismiss a Rightful Complaint with substantial evidence and facts against Defendants IV. Is it lawful for U.S. District Court to dismiss a Complaint even when Defendants Offers an Admission Of Guilt to evidence and facts as stated in Complaint by Pro Se Petitioner V. Is it lawful for Judge Paige J. Gossett of U.S. District Court to issued a Second Report and Recommendation to Deny Justice after Pro Se Petitioner filed a Motion to Accept In Part and Objection In Part VI. Is it lawful for U.S. District Court Judge, Jacquelyn D. Austin to accept the Second Report and Recommendation instead of First Report and Recommendation by U.S. Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett which was accepted In part and objected in part. VII. Is it lawful for a State of South Carolina Government to caused Deprivaton by denying employment, denying a right to work and denying to earn income without cause using a secret blackballing VIII. Is it lawful for State of South Carolina Government to purchase and apply a secret blackballing affect of “BARRED FROM APPLYING’ against I as a African American of this state to deny employment impunities. IX. Is denying a Right To Work by SECRET BLACKBALLING of “BARRED FROM APPLYING” a Civil Rights Violations of Title VH of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 X. Is it lawful to dismiss a Complaint when Defendants are aware of the harm by an ADMISSION TO GUILT with applying a SECRET BLACKBALLING of “BARRED FROM APPLYING’ to deny employment opportunities