Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Stephen Corey Bryant v. Joel Anderson, Acting Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 23-4 · judgment January 27, 2025
Question presented
When a district court dismisses a federal habeas petition, a circuit court must issue a certificate of appealability for any claim in the petition whose dismissal is debatable among reasonable jurists. In contravention of this Court’s precedent, Bryant’s capital trial counsel failed to conduct a reasonable investigation and neither discovered nor presented available mitigating evidence of Bryant’s brain damage from exposure to alcohol in utero, which substantially impaired his capacity to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law. Bryant’s post-conviction counsel then failed to pursue relief based on sentencing counsel’s deficient investigation. Did the Fourth Circuit err when it denied a certificate of appealability on Bryant’s claim that post-conviction counsel’s deficient performance establishes cause for the procedural default under Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012)?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Gretchen Leigh Swift
Federal Public Defender
For respondent
Melody Jane Brown
South Carolina Attorney General's Office
Proceedings
- Oct 14 2025Petition DENIED.
- Sep 25 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
- Sep 23 2025Reply of petitioner Stephen Bryant filed. (Distributed)
- Sep 10 2025Brief of respondents Joel Anderson, et al. in opposition filed.
- Aug 07 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 10, 2025)
- May 28 2025Application (24A1150) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until August 7, 2025.
- May 21 2025Application (24A1150) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 8, 2025 to August 7, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.