Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Deandre Blackman v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 24-5517 · judgment May 1, 2025
Question presented
The supervised-release statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), lists factors from 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) for a court to consider when sentencing a person for violating a supervised-release condition. In that list, Congress omitted the factors set forth in § 3553(a)(2)(A)—the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offense, promote respect for the law, and provide just punishment for the offense. As a result, this Court recently held that courts cannot rely on those § 3553(a)(2)(A) factors when revoking supervised release. See Esteras v. United States, 145 S.Ct. 2031 (June 20, 2025). The question presented in this case is closely related: Whether courts may rely on the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A) factors when determining the length and conditions of additional supervision following a supervised release revocation?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jarrod James Beck
Law Office of Jarrod J. Beck, PLLC
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 06 2025Petition DENIED.
- Aug 28 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
- Aug 20 2025Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Jul 29 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 4, 2025)