Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Deandre Blackman v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 24-5517 · judgment May 1, 2025
Question presented
The supervised-release statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), lists factors from 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) for a court to consider when sentencing a person for violating a supervised-release condition. In that list, Congress omitted the factors set forth in § 3553(a)(2)(A)—the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offense, promote respect for the law, and provide just punishment for the offense. As a result, this Court recently held that courts cannot rely on those § 3553(a)(2)(A) factors when revoking supervised release. See Esteras v. United States, 145 S.Ct. 2031 (June 20, 2025). The question presented in this case is closely related: Whether courts may rely on the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A) factors when determining the length and conditions of additional supervision following a supervised release revocation?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jarrod James Beck
Law Office of Jarrod J. Beck, PLLC
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 6, 2025 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 06 2025Petition DENIED.
- Aug 28 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
- Aug 20 2025Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Jul 29 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 4, 2025)