Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Maria Dolores Navarro Martin
IFP petition
Questions presented
-
The question presented is whether the District Court had jurisdiction of this suit under the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act.
-
Whether The Attorney General, exercised his discretion under the § 914.22(l)(a) Fla. Stat., to make individualized determinations of inadmissibility under an unconstitutional state statute of conviction, and
-
Whether the Immigration judge and ICE officials exercised this broad discretion under the statutes and regulations under an unconstitutional state statute of conviction no stated in "the Notice to appear" and if it will be remanded to determine whether petitioner was afforded due process.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Maria Navarro Martin
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Civil Rights (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 6, 2025 · Habeas corpus denied
Proceedings
- Oct 06 2025The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
- Jul 17 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
- Apr 08 2025Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.