Richard Rynn, et al. v. UHS of Phoenix, LLC, et al.

Whether due process is violated when state courts rely on a concealed ex parte proceeding and fraudulent allegations—previously adjudicated as lacking competent evidence—fail to correct the record or adjudicate core claims, thereby denying Petitioners a meaningful hearing and issuing void rulings.

Whether courts may ignore sworn admissions holding the State of Arizona liable for injuries to Marcella and her parents, and disregard the precedent of earlier court judgments, without violating due process?

Whether claim preclusion may bar a minor’s independent claims where she was not permitted to proceed in her own name, indispensable parties were absent, and newly discovered evidence shows fraud on the court and due process violations?

Whether a state court may summarily deny review under Ariz. R. Civ. P. 22(f), without factual findings, and refuse to adjudicate a Rule 60(b) motion alleging fraud on the court and jurisdictional defects—despite settled precedent that such motions are not timebarred—without violating the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?