Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Audrey Clement v. The Washington Post
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 24-7190 · judgment July 23, 2025
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
A. The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (“ADA”) provides federal court jurisdiction over allegations of age discrimination when the plaintiff has exhausted administrative remedies. Exhaustion occurs only when the initial complaint is filed timely with a federal agency of jurisdiction that does not rule in favor of the complainant or fails to rule at all. 42 U.S.C. §§ 6104(e)-(f). Since administrative exhaustion can only occur when a federal agency of jurisdiction exists, the question is whether in the absence of such an agency, the ADA is a dead letter. B. If federal courts have original jurisdiction over age discrimination complaints where no agency of jurisdiction exists, the question is whether such jurisdiction extends to entities that negotiate procurement contracts with the federal government, 42 U.S.C. § 6103(a)(4). C. If procurement contracts are covered by the ADA, the question is whether Respondent Washington Post, Inc.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Audrey Clement
For respondent
Nicholas Garber Gamse
Williams & Connolly LLP
Case
Subject area
Civil Rights (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, November 17, 2025 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Nov 17 2025Petition DENIED.
- Oct 29 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/14/2025.
- Oct 22 2025Waiver of right of respondent Washington Post to respond filed.
- Sep 22 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 5, 2025)