Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Kenneth Fitch, et al. v. Maryland, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 23-2135, 24-2266 · judgment May 20, 2025
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
Petitioners, retired state employees, filed a complaint alleging that their employer, the State of Maryland, breached a statutory unilateral contract to provide state subsidized prescription drug benefits in retirement. The District Court found a contract existed for certain State retirees. The Fourth Circuit reversed that decision, ruling that a contract was not created based on the unmistakability doctrine. Six months after Petitioners appealed, Maryland established the Qualified Resident Program that will provide access to and subsidize state and federal healthcare programs for illegal aliens. THE QUESTIONS PRESENTED ARE:
-
Whether the use of the unmistakability doctrine renders a fulfilled statutory unilateral employment contract illusory.
-
Whether Maryland may discriminate in favor of illegal aliens and against State retirees by providing subsidies for prescription drug benefits through Medicare Part D; and if so, whether the specific discriminatory provisions of the Qualified Residence Program in Maryland’s Access to Care Act are unconstitutional.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Deborah Ann Holloway Hill
Law Office of Deborah Hill, LLC
For respondent
Ryan Robert Dietrich
Office of the Attorney General of Maryland
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 06 2025Petition DENIED.
- Aug 27 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
- Aug 21 2025Waiver of right of respondent Maryland, et al. to respond filed.
- Aug 18 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 22, 2025)