In Re Yi Tai Shao

QUESTION NO.l: Shall a writ of habeas corpus be issued when Petitioner has been completely barred from any access to the court about her grievances that arose from the vexatious litigant orders and dismissal in Shao v. McManis Faulkner, James McManis, Michael Reedy and Catherine Bechtel (Santa Clara County, California, 2012-l-cv-220571) in the past 14 years, including, but not limited to, California Supreme Court’s 5/16/2024 order in Petition No.S283308 where the court misused “summary denial” of a Prefiling Vexatious Litigant Application to block filing of the Petition for Writ of Mandamus No.S283308 when the court had no legal basis to require such Application when the vexatious litigant orders were directly at issue, such that California courts, at all levels, conspired in avoiding a decision, for 3+ years, on her uncontested motion to vacate the dismissal that was ordered, without notice, by Judge Christopher G. Rudy who was/is an officer of James McManis’s club, American Inns of Court, and motion to vacate the vexations litiga.nt orders of Judge Maureen A. Folan who was James McManis’s attorney and was sponsored by McManis to be a judge, when Folan’s order had been used to block Petitioner from filing any motion to change child custody, when all justices at California Supreme Court are officers of the same club, and California Supreme Court concealed Petitioner’s motion to vacate