Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Colorado Bondshares, et al. v. Marin Metropolitan District, et al.
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Colorado, No. 2024CA1092 · judgment June 12, 2025
(petition-stage, structural)
Well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
In an issue of first impression with potential far-reaching impacts, whether the Colorado Court of Appeals correctly construed case law stemming from this Court by concluding that a special district’s debt to bondholders need not be repaid because the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution bars imposing a special assessment on a landowner not benefited by improvements, even where the owner acquired the land with full knowledge of both the special assessment and the lack of benefits that would be received.
-
In another issue of first impression with similarly far-reaching potential impacts, whether the Colorado Court of Appeals correctly construed case law emanating from this Court by concluding that a special district’s debt to bondholders need not be repaid under a theory of unjust enrichment where the district allegedly spent the money.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Neil Leslie Arney
Kutak Rock LLP
For respondent
Patrick Michael Kane
Fox Rothschild LLP
Proceedings
- Jul 01 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Jun 16 2026Waiver of right of respondent Marin Metropolitan District to respond filed.
- Jun 15 2026Waiver of right of respondent CENTURY AT LANDMARK, LLC to respond filed.
- May 27 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 1, 2026)
- May 01 2026Application (25A1202) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until May 27, 2026.
- Apr 10 2026Application (25A1202) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 26, 2026 to June 25, 2026, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.