Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Korean Claimants v. Dow Silicones Corporation, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 25-1004 · judgment April 10, 2025


Certiorari denied · October 14, 2025
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

This case presents a question that the Closing Orders for Dow Corning breast implant Settlement Facility and its Program, issued by the District Court and affirmed by the Sixth Circuit, and the Respondent’s Motion to terminate funding and to terminate the Settlement Facility without a proper notice to the foreign claimants including the Korean claimants is such constitutional that those were not a violation of due process. The foreign claimants including the Korean claimants have not received any notice of the Closing Orders when each Order was issued and further did not receive a notice of status of their claims when the Order granting the Motion to Terminate was issued. Whether the District Court can approve the bankruptcy chapter 11 debtor, Dow Corning Corporation’s Motion to terminate funding and to terminate the Settlement Facility without paying to the Korean claimants without proper notice is a question. This case presents a question that when the foreign claimants participated in a United States class action, the class action was developed into a chapter 11 bankruptcy, and the foreign claimants decided to participate into the settlement program under the Reorganization Plan, the foreign claimants must follow the address update and confirmation requirement which was never provisioned in the Plan documents but established by the District Court’ Orders regarding their address update and confirmation requirement pursuant to the debtor’s mere request. The Korean claimants rather followed the address update and confirmation requirement and submitted their address updates but the Settlement Facility denied them in accordance with its internal rules. The postal service of

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Yeon Ho Kim
Yeon-Ho Kim International Law Office

For respondent
Deborah Elizabeth Greenspan
Blank Rome LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 14 2025
    Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
  2. Oct 11 2025
    Supplemental Brief of Korean Claimants submitted.
  3. Sep 17 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
  4. Sep 03 2025
    Brief of respondent Dow Silicones Corporation in opposition filed.
  5. Jul 09 2025
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 3, 2025)