Philip E. Hahn v. New Jersey, et al.

Should the members of the current Supreme court affirm the prior Supreme courts’ opinions? Slocum v. New York Insurance Co., 228 US 364 is clear where the right to trial by jury of 12 is to be ‘preserved’. Slocum v. New York Life Insurance Co., 228 US 364 is also clear where a jury is to perform its office. The question presented is:

Can the judges in the state of New Jersey decide a case in the absence of a jury of 12 confirmation of the court’s finding of fact? Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove & Robeson, 28 U.S. 3 Pet. 433 433 (1830) is clear where there is a right to trial by jury in every state constitution. The question presented is:

Is there a right to trial by jury, of more than just a judge-jury of one, in a court created via New Jersey state law? Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938)is clear where the Supreme court can create general federal common law. The question presented is:

Have the previous Supreme courts of the United States created general federal common law, via the prior Supreme courts’ opinions, that is binding on a judge presiding over a court created via New Jersey state law? Halin v. The state of New Jersey and the Rutgers Law School