Christopher Veto v. The Boeing Company

The following are questions that we provide for the Supreme Court of the United States which we hold in great regard:

1. Despite Muscarello (1998) and Kyllo (2001), there was illicit Narcotics use at the Boeing Long Beach facility Building 800 by Nergal Daniel and others, aided and abetted by Ryan H. Gardner (then manager) in 2023 who wrongly said, “Marijuana is legal in California.” Does the United States Constitution, an original document of fixed historical meaning, including The Interstate Commerce Clause Art. 1 Sec. 8, The Ex Post Facto Clause Art. 1 Sec. 9, and The Supremacy Clause Art 6 Sec. 2, invoking 21 USC 802, apply to the state of California and to Boeing which operates in California?

2. What is the penalty to Boeing for violating their obligation to disclose reports of Narcotics at the Boeing Long Beach facility in 2023 to the US Department of Justice?

3. What is the penalty to Boeing for then Boeing Director Sean Woodward threatening me, a whistleblower, with Violence?

4. What is the penalty to Boeing for continuing to place commercial aviation customers on contract after being notified of the presence of illegal drugs at the Boeing Long Beach facility in 2023?

5. What right does Boeing have to allow managers to pressure the Other Designation Authorization (ODA), a