Leslie Sanders v. City of Long Beach, California

Where the Lower Court Judge ruled in erred in Leslie Sanders vs. City of Long Beach by not allowing substantial evidence to be enter in court by the plaintiffs that was logged and filed, that could dispute the defendant's knowledge of a dangerous and negligence condition, inconsistent statements from the substantial credible witness, violating our 5th, 6th and 14th Constitutional Amendments under Due Process, the judge ruled the plaintiffs could not use that evidence to impeach the witness for falsities, depriving the plaintiffs from cross examination and confrontation of the individual that provided the defendants hearsay statements that was not under oath. Judicial Biased by the Judge Kim, commenting throughout the proceeding how the defendants were the only one with truthful, credible, knowledgeable with confident testimony, lastly the blatant departure from established uniformity of U.S. precedent laws and state laws and Federal rule of evidence. Under what circumstances do the plaintiffs have justice and equality under the rule of law after these substantial procedural issues and violations that present an important question of Federal Law and protected rights.