Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Brian Armstrong v. WB Studio Enterprises, Inc., et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 24-5049 · judgment October 27, 2025
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Should a judge or a jury decide the fact intensive question of whether intentional discrimination against white people in the workplace—done pursuant to a corporate DEI policy—satisfies the “but for” causation standard in 42 U.S.C. § 1981?
-
Whether, under the “but for” causation standard established in Comcast Corp. v. National Ass’n of African American-Owned Media, 589 U.S. 327 (2020), a court may grant summary judgment by examining only the actions of a single subordinate decision-maker in isolation, where the record contains evidence that supervisors above that decision-maker directed raceconscious hiring decisions as part of an integrated corporate scheme to implement a discriminatory diversity policy. (i)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Scott James Street
JW Howard Attorneys
For respondent
Corey Gene Singer
Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP
Proceedings
- May 04 2026Petition DENIED.
- Apr 15 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2026.
- Apr 13 2026Waiver of right of respondent WB Studio Enterprises, Inc., and Warner Brothers Entertainment, Inc. to respond filed.
- Mar 26 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 30, 2026)
- Jan 23 2026Application (25A844) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 26, 2026.
- Jan 21 2026Application (25A844) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 25, 2026 to March 26, 2026, submitted to Justice Kagan.