Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Joe Louis Adams, Jr. v. 3D Systems, Inc.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 23-1147, 23-1356, 23-1473, 23-1659 · judgment January 17, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Plaintiff submits agreement to the court that was used to set the Counter claim for the defendant... The plaintiff notes in the order from the judge that she sites information contained in the agreement all aspects except the part of the agreement for arbitration; part
-
Plaintiff contends that the defendant has been allowed “double jeopardy”. If the agreement has an arbitration clause the court is ignoring the demand and agreement for arbitration and has commenced proceedings using self-serving excerpts from the Arbitration and Confidentiality agreement. Judge Lewis never made reference to the arbitration clause on the first page and section 13.5. Plaintiff ask if the district court has jurisdiction to enforce the trade agreement past the arbitration clause that was agreed upon and signed prior to any dispute.
-
The plaintiff would like to present a question of jurisdiction. In Order USCA4: 23-1147 Doc
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Joe L. Adams Jr.
For respondent
—
Proceedings
- Oct 06 2025Petition DENIED.
- Sep 10 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
- Jul 12 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 28, 2025)
- May 06 2024Application (23A987) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until July 12, 2024.
- May 01 2024Application (23A987) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 13, 2024 to July 12, 2024, submitted to The Chief Justice.