Kaci May, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem for A. R. M., J. H. M., J. T. M., C. B. M., J. R. M., and J. W. M. v. Dorchester School District No. 2, et al.

The Supreme Court of South Carolina left undisturbed the decision of the South Carolina Court of Appeals’ decision holding S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7- 920 allows the unrestricted interrogation of public school children by state child protective services (CPS) workers in blatant disregard of parents’ and children’s 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendment rights under the United States Constitution.

1. Did the trial court/state appellate courts err in finding that S.C. Code Ann. §63-7-920 was not limited by the Petitioners’ constitutional protections under Amend. I, IV, V, VI, and XIV of the U.S. Const.

2. Did the trial court/state appellate courts err in finding the Petitioners’ failed to meet the factors granting injunctive relief? Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski, 592 U.S. 279, 286, 209 L.Ed. 2d 94, 101, 141 S.Ct. 792 (2021).