Jenn-Ching Luo v. Owen J. Roberts School District, et al.

Whether bombing courts or shooting judges is a holy mission to counter a corrupt judicial system? That is a satire to ridicule the Courts below if a corrupt judicial system is on the other side of God for God to clean up. It is uncertain how other Circuits did their job. However, in the Third Circuit, the proceeding is nothing but a game for a big guy. It is not a baseless accusation. The Courts below only issued orders against Petitioner regardless of the laws and records. They even issued per curiam orders, contravening precedents, to rule against Petitioner; how could a Court issue a per curiam order in contravenance with precedent? Also, to rule against Petitioner, the Courts below did not comply with procedural rules. For example, the main controversy in this proceeding is the determination of the answer deadline for defendants to respond to the summons. Determining the answer deadline is a fundamental determination common in every case. However, in this action, the Courts below did not determine the answer deadline but let defense counsels do no matter what defense counsels wanted. Does this system deserve trust? There was a controversy; the defendants disagreed that the answer deadline existed. If so, the courts below should decide on it, especially the answer deadline, based on which defendants should respond to the summons in a timely manner. Then, the litigation could move on. However, the Courts below never decided on the answer deadline but kept the controversy remained in controversy. Because the defendants did not respond to the summons, the