Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Franciscan Alliance, Inc., et al. v. Indiana
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Indiana, No. 24S-PL-00118 · judgment October 31, 2024
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel with five or more prior petitions here, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and a petition filed soon after the judgment below, and down for a state or local-government respondent.
Question presented
The State of Indiana undisputedly took the Petitioners property through eminent domain procedures to complete a road project. The completed project changed the Petitioners valuable commercial uses into far less valuable residential uses. A jury awarded Petitioners significant monetary damages based upon evidence arising from damages caused by the project as a whole. Ultimately, the Indiana Supreme Court reversed the award, voiding all just compensation holding that just compensation must arise from the loss of a particular property right as the Petitioners had no property right as to the project as a whole. The question presented is: When the government undisputedly takes a real property right, is a landowner entitled to just compensation from the imposition of a project as a whole, or must just compensation solely be directly tied to the loss of specific property rights?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Erick G. Kaardal
Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson P.A.
For respondent
James Allen Barta
Office of the Indiana Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Mar 03 2025Petition DENIED.
- Feb 12 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2025.
- Feb 05 2025Waiver of right of respondent State of Indiana to respond filed.
- Jan 28 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 3, 2025)