Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
David Hill, Individually and dba DOH Oil Company v. Huntley Fort Gill, et al.
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Texas, No. 22-0913 · judgment April 26, 2024
Before the decision, about 1.7× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and a petition filed soon after the judgment below.
Question presented
The Texas Tax Code provides a statute of limitations on challenges to a purchaser’s title to property acquired at a tax foreclosure sale. If a person was not served citation in the tax foreclosure suit, but continues paying property taxes following the tax sale, that person may challenge the validity of the tax sale at any time. Otherwise, a one-year limitations period applies, after which the purchaser has full title to the property. The Texas Supreme Court rejected the statute’s application to a claim that a tax sale was invalid because the foreclosed owner was not properly served. The court held that a statute can never limit the time to challenge a judgment taken without constitutionally adequate notice. The question presented, on which the States are deeply divided, is: Whether a statute can limit the time to challenge a tax sale for lack of constitutionally adequate notice to the owner, provided that the statute does not unreasonably limit the aggrieved owner’s time to enforce its rights.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Matthew Steven Wolcott
Freeman Mills PC
For respondent
Sean M. Guerrero
Stubbeman, McRae, Sealy, Laughlin & Browder, Inc.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2024Petition DENIED.
- Aug 21 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
- Aug 07 2024Waiver of right of respondent Huntley Fort Gill, et al. to respond filed.
- Jul 22 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2024)