Daniel Jones v. Danielle Tope

WHETHER THE LOWER COURTS ERRED IN ADJUDICATING CLAIMS IN HABEAS CORPUS PETITIONS TO DETERMINE A VIOLATION OF THGE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WHEN THERE IS NO CLEARLY ESTABLISHED LAW RELATING TO CIVIL MANAGEMENT PROCEEDINGS WHETHER THE LOWER COURTS DEPARTED FROM THE ACCEPTED AND USUAL COURSE OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW DISPOSITIVE MATTERS DE NOVO, THAT AMOUNT TO A VIOLATION OF THE MAGISTRATE ACT, HABEAS RUEEH8(b), ARTICLE III, AND THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH AMEND. TO UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION