Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Daniel Montes, Jr. v. Bertha A. Tibbs
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 24-20135 · judgment August 16, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
In Caribbean Mills, Inc., 394 U.S. 823 (1969), this Court held that: “where the transfer of a claim is absolute, with the transferor retaining no interest in the subject matter, then the transfer is not improperly or collusively made, regardless of the transferor’s motive”,n. 9 (citations omitted).” The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld that the Plaintiff’s absolute assignment was improper. This presents the following issue: Whether the Fifth Circuit’s decision conflicts with this Court’s binding precedent in Caribbean Mills, Inc., 394 U.S. 823 (1969), footnote 9 (citations omitted)?
-
In Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986), this Court held that: “The plain language of Rule 56(c) mandates the entry of summary judgment, after adequate time for discovery and upon motion..”,at 322-326.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Daniel Montes Jr.
For respondent
Ronald James Shaw
Shaw Law PLLC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jan 27 2025Petition DENIED.
- Jan 08 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2025.
- Jan 02 2025Waiver of right of respondent Bertha A. Tibbs to respond filed.
- Sep 26 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 3, 2025)