Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Texas, et al. v. Jerry Black, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 23-10520 · judgment July 5, 2024


GVR'd · June 30, 2025
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

QU E S TIO N P RE SE N TE D In 2020, Congress enacted the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (HISA) to, for the first time, federally regulate the horseracing industry. 15 U.S.C. §§3051-60. HISA gives the power to “develop[] and implement[] a horseracing anti-doping and medication control program and a racetrack safety program” to a “private, independent, self-regulatory, nonprofit corporation”—the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority (the Authority). Id. §3052(a). Under HISA, the Authority proposes rules that are reviewed by the Federal Trade Commission (the FTC), id. § 3053(a), but the FTC is prohibited from rejecting the rules unless they violate HISA or other applicable rules, id. §3053(c)(2). The Fifth Circuit initially held that this delegation of legislative authority is unconstitutional. Congress reacted, not by altering this process, but by giving the FTC the option (but not the duty) to undertake its own notice-and-comment rulemaking to abrogate, add to, and modify the Authority’s rules. Id. §3053(e). Accordingly, unless and until the FTC decides to intervene, the horseracing industry remains governed by the Authority—a private entity operating outside of any constitutional safeguards. And even if the FTC choses to intervene, its statutory powers are limited. The question presented is whether Congress has unconstitutionally delegated legislative authority to a private entity in HISA. (I)

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Aaron Lloyd Nielson
Office of the Texas Attorney General

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 3 conferences

Related
Vide, 24-429, 24-433, 24-472, 24-489

Proceedings

  1. Aug 01 2025
    Judgment Issued. (Corrected version issued on 8/5/2025)
  2. Jun 30 2025
    Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of FCC v. Consumers’ Research, 606 U. S. ___ (2025).
  3. Jun 26 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
  4. Jan 13 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2025.
  5. Dec 04 2024
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
  6. Dec 02 2024
    Reply of petitioners Texas, et al. filed. (Distributed)
  7. Nov 21 2024
    Brief of Federal Respondents in opposition filed. VIDED.
  8. Nov 12 2024
    Brief of respondents Jerry Black, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED.
  9. Oct 22 2024
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 25, 2024)