Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Texas, et al. v. Jerry Black, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 23-10520 · judgment July 5, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
QU E S TIO N P RE SE N TE D In 2020, Congress enacted the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (HISA) to, for the first time, federally regulate the horseracing industry. 15 U.S.C. §§3051-60. HISA gives the power to “develop[] and implement[] a horseracing anti-doping and medication control program and a racetrack safety program” to a “private, independent, self-regulatory, nonprofit corporation”—the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority (the Authority). Id. §3052(a). Under HISA, the Authority proposes rules that are reviewed by the Federal Trade Commission (the FTC), id. § 3053(a), but the FTC is prohibited from rejecting the rules unless they violate HISA or other applicable rules, id. §3053(c)(2). The Fifth Circuit initially held that this delegation of legislative authority is unconstitutional. Congress reacted, not by altering this process, but by giving the FTC the option (but not the duty) to undertake its own notice-and-comment rulemaking to abrogate, add to, and modify the Authority’s rules. Id. §3053(e). Accordingly, unless and until the FTC decides to intervene, the horseracing industry remains governed by the Authority—a private entity operating outside of any constitutional safeguards. And even if the FTC choses to intervene, its statutory powers are limited. The question presented is whether Congress has unconstitutionally delegated legislative authority to a private entity in HISA. (I)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Aaron Lloyd Nielson
Office of the Texas Attorney General
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Proceedings
- Aug 01 2025Judgment Issued. (Corrected version issued on 8/5/2025)
- Jun 30 2025Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of FCC v. Consumers’ Research, 606 U. S. ___ (2025).
- Jun 26 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
- Jan 13 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2025.
- Dec 04 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
- Dec 02 2024Reply of petitioners Texas, et al. filed. (Distributed)
- Nov 21 2024Brief of Federal Respondents in opposition filed. VIDED.
- Nov 12 2024Brief of respondents Jerry Black, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED.
- Oct 22 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 25, 2024)