Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Reuben Larson v. CommunityWorks North Dakota, et al.
Paid petition · Supreme Court of North Dakota, No. 20240038 · judgment May 24, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Is a rule of court unconstitutional which mandates that an appeal brief cannot exceed a certain number of pages, and which mandates that the appellant/appellee number the paragraphs in the brief, and if either or both is not complied with, one’s appeal brief will not be filed and so one’s appeal will be dismissed. Does a judge/justice have to give reasons for their ruling. Is it valid to cite and use the rule/statute under attack as the reason to deny the attack on the rule, to declare the rule legal.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Reuben Larson
For respondent
Garrett D. Ludwig
Kelsch Ruff Kranda Nagle & Ludwig
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Dec 09 2024Petition DENIED.
- Nov 13 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2024.
- Oct 29 2024Waiver of right of respondent Community Works North Dakota, et al. to respond filed.
- Aug 09 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 12, 2024)