Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
For Our Rights, Inc., et al. v. David Y. Ige
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 23-15756 · judgment June 20, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
In 2020, it was clearly established that Americans had constitutional rights to liberty, to work, and to travel, among others. Moreover, it was clearly established that whenever state officials sought to curtail these or other rights, they could only do so if they had probable cause and provided due process. Yet, during the COVID-19 crisis, these rights were violated when David Ige, then Governor of Hawai′i, subjected citizens to lockdowns and quarantines without according them any due process. QUESTION: Does a state governor, who imposes emergency “lockdowns” on all citizens and quarantines based on travel status under color of state law, enjoy qualified immunity when sued in his personal capacity under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by those whose clearly established rights to procedural due process and against unreasonable seizure are violated by those restrictions?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Lowell H. Becraft Jr.
Lowell H. Becraft, Jr.
For respondent
Sianha Michael Gualano
Dept. of the Attorney General, State of Hawaii
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Nov 04 2024Petition DENIED.
- Oct 16 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2024.
- Oct 08 2024Waiver of right of respondent David Ige to respond filed.
- Sep 18 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 4, 2024)