Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Muzafar Babakr v. Jacob T. Fowles, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 23-3026 · judgment April 5, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a moving party is allowed an out-of-time filing if they establish excusable neglect. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(B). Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, summary judgment is appropriate only if the “movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). The questions presented, over two of which the courts of appeals are openly and squarely split, are: Whether the four Pioneer factors set out by this Court for the test of excusable neglect carry unequal weight such that the third one outweighs all three other factors and must be the only factor to be considered for determining excusable neglect. Whether the burden-shifting framework of summary judgment is altered when qualified immunity is raised such that the nonmoving party should bear the initial summary judgment burden. Whether summary judgment should be granted where the evidence of the movant is contradictory.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Muzafar Babakr
For respondent
Eric Aufdengarten
University of Kansas
Proceedings
- Dec 09 2024Petition DENIED.
- Nov 13 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2024.
- Oct 10 2024Waiver of right of respondent Jacob T. Fowles, et al. to respond filed.
- Sep 30 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 1, 2024)
- Aug 21 2024Application (24A165) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until September 30, 2024.
- Aug 08 2024Application (24A165) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 21, 2024 to September 30, 2024, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.