Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Plotagraph, Inc., et al. v. Lightricks, Ltd.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2023-1048 · judgment January 22, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Inventors Troy Plota, Sascha Connelly and Plotagraph, Inc (Plotagraph) own and practice five patents that disclose applications allowing users to create the illusion of movement within a digital photograph or video. Through a series of specific claimed steps, the patents allow a user to automate pixel shifting in digital photos or videos. The pixel shifting cannot be accomplished manually or with pen and paper. The question presented is: Whether the claims at issue in the Plotagraph patents are patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101, as interpreted in Alice Corporation Pty v. CLS Bank International, 573 U.S. 208 (2014) in view of the claims directed to computer animation as allowed in McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games America, 837 F.3d 1299 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
David Arthur Walker
Schneider Wallace Cottrell Konecky LLP
For respondent
Jonathan Saul Franklin
Norton Rose Fulbright US, LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 15 2024Petition DENIED.
- Sep 25 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
- Sep 20 2024Waiver of right of respondent Lightricks, Ltd. to respond filed.
- Jun 24 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 21, 2024)