Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Next Generation Technology, Inc., et al. v. Ur M. Jaddou, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 23-495 · judgment April 11, 2024
Before the decision, about 2.9× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a Second Circuit decision below, and a petition filed soon after the judgment below.
Questions presented
-
Can arguments in support of a court’s subject-matter jurisdiction be waived?
-
The Federal Magistrates Act provides that a “judge of the [district] court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the [magistrate judge’s] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Does § 636(b)(1) permit a district court to find that a party has waived de novo review of an objection to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendations because the issue or argument was not first raised before the magistrate?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Khagendra D. Gharti Chhetry
Chhetry & Associates P.C
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Subject area
Judicial Power (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 7, 2024 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2024Petition DENIED.
- Aug 07 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
- Aug 01 2024Waiver of right of respondent Ur M Jaddou, USCIS and Immigration services, et al. to respond filed.
- Jul 09 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 12, 2024)