Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Heidi Stirrup, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as a Member of the Board of Visitors for the Air Force Academy, et al. v. Department of Defense, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 23-5094 · judgment June 7, 2024


Certiorari denied · November 4, 2024
Pre-decision estimate: 10% cert probability (95% interval 6%–16%)

Before the decision, about 2.4× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a D.C. Circuit decision below, counsel with five or more prior petitions here, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition).

Questions presented

Petitioners were appointed to the Boards of Visitors of the three United States military academies. These Boards are advisory groups subject to the Federal Advisory Committees Act, and are not Executive Branch agencies. To ensure that the Boards exercise their “independent judgment,” are not “inappropriately inf luenced by the appointing authority,” the terms of presidentially appointed Board members are statutorily set at three years. The statutes do not authorize the President to remove Board members. 'HVSLWHWKHVHWHUPRIRIÀFHSURWHFWLRQV5HVSRQGHQWV suspended the operations of the Boards for seven months, then removed Petitioners from their respective Boards, and authorized the creation of “subcommittees” of the Boards—“subcommittees” staffed by persons who are not members of the Boards. Petitioners sued, but the Court of Appeals, held that because the three-year terms had expired by the time it ruled, the case was moot. The questions presented are:

  1. Whether Petitioners may seek injunctive and declaratory relief given that the issues raised here are “capable of repetition, yet evading review.”

  2. Whether the President may remove at will any presidentially appointed members of these independent advisory Boards, whose three-year WHUPVDUHVSHFLÀHGE\VWDWXWHDQGZKRH[HUFLVH no executive authority; suspend the operation of the Boards; and establish alternative entities staffed by people who are not Board members.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Timothy Mason Sandefur
Goldwater Institute

For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Nov 04 2024
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Oct 16 2024
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2024.
  3. Oct 09 2024
    Waiver of right of respondent Federal Respondents to respond filed.
  4. Sep 05 2024
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 9, 2024)