Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Gordon Wood v. Winnebago Industries, Inc.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 22-16805 · judgment June 3, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The Magnuson Moss Warranty Act creates a private right of action for any “consumer who is damaged by the failure of a supplier, warrantor, or service contractor to comply with any obligation under [the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act], or under a written warranty, implied warranty, or service contract.” 15 U.S.C. § 2310(d)(1). The Magnuson Moss Warranty Act “is remedial in nature and is designed to facilitate relief which would otherwise not be available as a practical matter for individual consumers.” Kelly v. Fleetwood Enters., 377 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2004). Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 2307 of the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act, a warrantor may designate representatives to perform duties under the written or implied warranty, but no such designation shall relieve the warrantor of his direct responsibilities to the consumer or make the representative a cowarrantor. The question presented is: 1. Does a warrantor remain liable for its warranty obligations when it designates a representative pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 2307 to fulfill those obligations?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Ronald L. Burdge
Burdge Law Office, LPA
For respondent
Hans H. J. Pijls
Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 21 2024Petition DENIED.
- Oct 02 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2024.
- Sep 26 2024Waiver of right of respondent Winnebago Industries, Inc. to respond filed.
- Sep 03 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 7, 2024)