Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Bahig Saliba v. Allied Pilots Association
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 23-15631 · judgment April 30, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Whethei' a collective bargaining agent has authority to negotiate terms and conditions that impact the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) pilot medical certification standards, pilot authorities, and ability to secure a right to compensation created in the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (The Act), and whether The Act gives the Petitioner a private right to action. Whether by adopting and supporting the air carrier’s demands for a medical treatment(s) or procedure(s) that directly impact the Petitioner’s FAA medical certification standards, and by refusing to employ a defense strategy supported by authorities vested in the Petitioner by law during a grievance process, the Respondent abused protections afforded to it by the Supreme Court and the Railway Labor Act (RLA) and failed in its duty to fairly, in good faith, and without discrimination represent the Petitioner.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Bahig Saliba
For respondent
Joshua B. Shiffrin
Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2024Petition DENIED.
- Aug 28 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
- Aug 22 2024Waiver of right of respondent Allied Pilots Association to respond filed.
- Jul 24 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 20, 2024)