Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Pamela Antosh, et al. v. Village of Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 23-1678 · judgment April 25, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Whether the court of appeals erred in affirming the district court, when the Village of Mount Pleasant admitted that it had used eminent domain to take private property for a private purpose (the Foxconn Project), and the district court applied the Colorado River doctrine sua sponte even though the state proceedings were not parallel because the state proceedings were statutorily barred from addressing the Petitioners’ Fifth Amendment public-use claim as well as other constitutional issues.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Erik Samuel Olsen
Eminent Domain Services, LLC
For respondent
Christopher Avallone
von Briesen & Roper, s.c.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Dec 16 2024Petition DENIED.
- Nov 26 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2024.
- Nov 04 2024Brief of respondents Village of Mount Pleasant, et al. in opposition filed.
- Sep 12 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 4, 2024.
- Sep 10 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 20, 2024 to November 4, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jul 24 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 20, 2024)