Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Raymond H. Pierson, III v. Northern California Collection Service, Inc., et al.
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, No. C089972 · judgment August 30, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The right to a remedy in the courts for wrongful injury holds a revered place in our civil justice system. Lord Coke traced this tight to Chapter 29 of the Magna Carta, which guaranteed: “Every subject may take his remedy by course of the Law, and have justice, and right for injury done to him. ..”1 Edward Coke, the Second Part of the Institutes of the laws of England 55 (London, E. & R. Brooke 797). Chief Justice Marshall restated that principle for Americans: The very essence of civil liberty certainly consists in the right of every individual to claim the protection of the laws, whenever he receives an injury. One of the first duties of government is to afford that protection. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U. s. (l Cranch) 137, 163 (1803). Thus, our Fifth Amendment guarantee of due process is an “affirmation of Magna Carta according to Coke.” Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Haslip, 499 U. S. 1, 29 (1991) (Scalia, J., concurring).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Raymond H. Pierson II
For respondent
—
Proceedings
- Oct 15 2024Petition DENIED.
- Sep 18 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
- May 10 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 6, 2024)
- Mar 11 2024Application (23A834) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 11, 2024.
- Dec 07 2023Application (23A834) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 12, 2024 to May 11, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.