Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Katie Sczesny, et al. v. Philip Murphy, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Governor of New Jersey, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 24-1676 · judgment March 14, 2025
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Does the voluntary cessation doctrine require a defendant to provide affirmative assurance that the challenged conduct will not recur, particularly when the conduct was enacted and repealed by executive fiat and the only basis for repeal was variable public health statistics?
-
Does a complaint seeking declaratory judgment on the constitutionality of a governor-imposed booster vaccine mandate remain an active controversy after the mandate’s repeal when the plaintiffs were terminated due to noncompliance and now have this adverse termination in their employment record?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Dana Lauren Wefer
Law Offices of Dana Wefer
For respondent
Francis Xavier Baker
Office of the New Jersey Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 06 2025Petition DENIED.
- Jul 23 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
- Jul 17 2025Waiver of right of respondent Gov. of NJ Murphy, et al. to respond filed.
- Jun 12 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 17, 2025)