Rahim Caldwell v. City of Providence, Rhode Island, et al.

Question 1 When the litigants are prose, should inferior courts be required to specify deficiencies to be corrected when a prose litigant is subjected to emergency certification by an individual that has not personally first-hand eyewitness prose petitioner engaged in any actions other than acting within under the constitution? Question 2 Is a prose litigant acting under the constitution subjected to application for emergency certification entitled to any right, whatsoever? Question 3 Is a prose litigant subjected to application for emergency certification entitled to any rights whatsoever? Question 4 Is respondent authorized by law to diagnose? Question 5 What law authorizes respondent to diagnose? Question 6 Is it justice for prose petitioner to be defeated due to inability to meet the standards of time constraints, and allow respondents to avoid justice