Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
John Paul Salvador v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 23-60008 · judgment March 1, 2024
Before the decision, about 4.8× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, a Ninth Circuit decision below, and a circuit split argued in the petition.
Question presented
The Bankruptcy Code provides that an individual debtor’s unpaid tax debts are dischargeable so long as they meet certain requirements. For older tax debts, one of those requirements is that the debtor have filed a “return” for each of the tax years in which the debts were incurred. Because many tax returns are filed after the dates on which they are due, the question whether a latefiled Form 1040 income tax return is a “return” is an important one that affects numerous debtors seeking a fresh start under the Bankruptcy Code each year. Due to a three-way circuit split, whether a debtor’s late-filed Form 1040 is a “return” depends on where the debtor lives. Three circuits hold that, even if the IRS accepts it as a tax return, a Form 1040 is not a “return” if it has any filing defects—meaning it is not a “return” if it is filed even one day late. Six circuits generally hold that a late but otherwise correctly filed Form 1040 is not a “return” if the IRS has already assessed the filer’s tax liability for the tax year for which it is filed, because in the courts’ view a Form 1040 filed so late does not represent an honest and reasonable attempt to satisfy the tax laws. One circuit, by contrast, has held that a late but otherwise correctly filed Form 1040 can be a “return,” even if filed after assessment, so long as the form, on its face, evinces an honest and reasonable attempt to satisfy the tax laws. The IRS, for its part, agrees with petitioner that late-filed returns are “returns” but takes the position that postassessment tax debts are generally nondischargeable based on an entirely different theory that has been rejected by virtually every court to consider it. The question presented is: Whether a late but otherwise correctly filed Form 1040 is a “return” for purposes of § 523(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. (i)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Andrew Timothy Tutt
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Proceedings
- Nov 04 2024Petition DENIED.
- Oct 16 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2024.
- Oct 14 2024Reply of petitioner John Paul Salvador filed. (Distributed)
- Sep 30 2024Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
- Aug 30 2024Brief amicus curiae of A. Lavar Taylor filed.
- Aug 30 2024Amicus brief of Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney Association not accepted for filing. (September 18, 2024) (corrected version submitted)
- Aug 30 2024Brief amicus curiae of Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney Association filed.
- Aug 29 2024Brief amici curiae of Professors Nicholas L. Georgakopoulos, et al. filed.
- Aug 29 2024Brief amicus curiae of American College of Tax Counsel filed.
- Aug 29 2024Brief amicus curiae of Center for Taxpayer Rights filed.
- Aug 13 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 30, 2024.
- Aug 12 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 30, 2024 to September 30, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jul 29 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 30, 2024)
- May 21 2024Application (23A1034) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 29, 2024.
- May 17 2024Application (23A1034) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 30, 2024 to July 29, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.