Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Violet Love Ray v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 23-13453 · judgment September 12, 2024
Before the decision, about 3× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and down for a state or local-government respondent.
Question presented
A state prisoner can appeal from the denial of a federal petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 only if she first obtains a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). Section 2253(c)(2), designed to screen out frivolous appeals, provides: “A certificate of appealability may issue … only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” Two courts of appeals have determined that a state judge’s view that post-conviction relief is warranted due to the denial of a constitutional right is ordinarily proof of “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” The decision below, however, denies Petitioner a certificate of appealability even though a state appellate judge determined she had established a right to relief on the merits of her constitutional ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim. The question presented is: Whether a certificate of appealability should issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) where one or more judges in the state-court habeas proceedings has determined the petitioner proved the denial of a constitutional right entitling her to post-conviction relief.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
E. Joshua Rosenkranz
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
For respondent
Rebecca Rock McGuigan
Office of Florida Attorney General
Proceedings
- May 19 2025Petition DENIED.
- Apr 29 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2025.
- Apr 24 2025Waiver of right of respondent Dixon, Sec., FL DOC, et al. to respond filed.
- Mar 21 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 24, 2025)
- Feb 07 2025Application (24A770) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until March 21, 2025.
- Feb 05 2025Application (24A770) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 19, 2025 to April 20, 2025, submitted to Justice Thomas.