Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Brian Bowen, II v. Adidas America, Inc., et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 21-1764, 21-2029 · judgment October 12, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Less than three years ago, this Court unanimously recognized that NCAA Division I student-athletes, as laborers, have a legally cognizable interest in the education-related benefits they receive as NCAA eligible student-athletes. Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Assoc. v. Alston, 141 S. Ct. 2141 (2021). Accepting the realities of modern-day college sports that have long been overlooked in lower courts, Alston observed that the “NCAA’s Division I essentially is the relevant market for elite college football and basketball,” and that “there are no ‘viable substitutes.’” Id. at 2152. Because of this market dominance, “student-athletes have nowhere else to sell their labor.” Id. at 2156 (emphasis added). A student-athlete’s eligibility to access this unparalleled market is therefore highly valuable. The question presented is: Do elite student-athletes preparing for professional athletic careers have a business or property interest in their NCAA eligibility? (i)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Colin Venkat Madhira Ram
McLeod Law Group LLC
For respondent
William H. Taft V
Debevoise & Plimpton, LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 22 2024Petition DENIED.
- Apr 03 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/19/2024.
- Mar 19 2024Waiver of right of respondent Adidas America, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
- Feb 20 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 27, 2024)